WMKSX vs. WMBLX
WMKSX (WesMark Small Company Fund) and WMBLX (WesMark Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - WMKSX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by WesMark, while WMBLX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by WesMark. Over the past 10 years, WMKSX returned 13.90%/yr vs 7.43%/yr for WMBLX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.24% expense ratio.
Performance
WMKSX vs. WMBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMKSX achieves a 20.68% return, which is significantly higher than WMBLX's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, WMKSX has outperformed WMBLX with an annualized return of 13.90%, while WMBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.43% annualized return.
WMKSX
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 24.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
WMBLX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 19.96%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
WMKSX vs. WMBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMKSX WesMark Small Company Fund | 20.68% | 16.19% | 22.12% | 19.42% | -20.72% | 22.81% | 36.78% | 20.32% | -13.92% | 13.21% |
WMBLX WesMark Balanced Fund | 8.91% | 10.81% | 9.28% | 4.97% | -7.22% | 15.85% | 2.82% | 20.32% | -4.61% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMKSX and WMBLX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1998 | 0.77 |
The correlation between WMKSX and WMBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMKSX vs. WMBLX — Risk / Return Rank
WMKSX
WMBLX
WMKSX vs. WMBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) and WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMKSX | WMBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.51 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 4.05 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | 16.36 | -1.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMKSX vs. WMBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMKSX drawdown since its inception was -64.09%, which is greater than WMBLX's maximum drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMKSX and WMBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMKSX | WMBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.09% | -35.88% | -28.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -4.97% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.20% | -11.57% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.84% | -17.77% | -22.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.84% | -23.30% | -16.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.15% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.66% | -6.37% | -9.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.23% | +1.30% |
Volatility
WMKSX vs. WMBLX - Volatility Comparison
WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX) at 2.93%. This indicates that WMKSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMKSX | WMBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 2.93% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 5.90% | +6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.90% | 7.41% | +10.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 10.26% | +15.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 10.85% | +13.13% |
WMKSX vs. WMBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WMKSX and WMBLX have an expense ratio of 1.24%.
Dividends
WMKSX vs. WMBLX - Dividend Comparison
WMKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.98%, more than WMBLX's 6.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMBLX WesMark Balanced Fund | 6.89% | 7.70% | 9.82% | 4.70% | 3.78% | 6.03% | 1.63% | 6.20% | 5.83% | 4.32% | 3.80% | 6.73% |
WMKSX WesMark Small Company Fund | 18.98% | 22.91% | 4.69% | 5.93% | 6.23% | 25.75% | 8.21% | 0.00% | 12.53% | 8.59% | 5.26% | 6.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMKSX and WMBLX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMKSX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to WMBLX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMKSX dropped -64.09% vs WMBLX's -35.88%.
WMBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMKSX and WMBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer