TSCIX vs. FECGX
TSCIX (AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund) and FECGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TSCIX returned 1.68%/yr vs 6.33%/yr for FECGX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TSCIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FECGX.
Performance
TSCIX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCIX achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly lower than FECGX's 20.77% return.
TSCIX
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
FECGX
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 20.77%
- 6M
- 16.62%
- 1Y
- 41.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- —
TSCIX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCIX AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund | 11.74% | 0.84% | 8.50% | 16.73% | -26.42% | 7.34% | 35.36% | 14.06% |
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 20.77% | 13.04% | 15.26% | 18.90% | -26.17% | 2.83% | 34.41% | 7.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCIX and FECGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TSCIX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCIX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank
TSCIX
FECGX
TSCIX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCIX | FECGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.31 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 2.82 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 10.12 | -7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCIX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCIX drawdown since its inception was -49.74%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCIX and FECGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCIX | FECGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.74% | -41.85% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.91% | -14.81% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.48% | -28.45% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.51% | -40.34% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | 0.00% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -15.66% | +4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 4.13% | +1.62% |
Volatility
TSCIX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) is 7.15%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that TSCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCIX | FECGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.15% | 7.99% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.38% | 16.84% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.09% | 22.17% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 24.70% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 27.22% | -3.54% |
TSCIX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCIX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison
TSCIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.45% | 0.54% | 1.25% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 3.43% | 1.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSCIX AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 6.63% | 22.45% | 13.38% | 22.41% | 30.72% | 10.75% | 3.70% | 11.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TSCIX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FECGX has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to TSCIX (7.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCIX dropped -49.74% vs FECGX's -41.85%.
FECGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSCIX and FECGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer