TSCIX vs. MEQFX
TSCIX (AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund) and MEQFX (AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund) are both mutual funds - TSCIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while MEQFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, TSCIX returned 10.05%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for MEQFX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TSCIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for MEQFX.
Performance
TSCIX vs. MEQFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCIX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than MEQFX's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCIX has underperformed MEQFX with an annualized return of 10.05%, while MEQFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.
TSCIX
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 10.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.69%
MEQFX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- -5.30%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TSCIX vs. MEQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCIX AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.17% | 0.84% | 8.50% | 16.73% | -26.42% | 7.34% | 35.36% | 44.90% | -4.05% | 21.17% |
MEQFX AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund | 0.15% | -2.58% | 24.99% | 19.53% | -9.50% | 43.58% | -4.00% | 16.01% | 8.16% | 15.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCIX and MEQFX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2000 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TSCIX and MEQFX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCIX vs. MEQFX — Risk / Return Rank
TSCIX
MEQFX
TSCIX vs. MEQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) and AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCIX | MEQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.93 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.42 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.31 | -0.70 | +2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCIX vs. MEQFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCIX drawdown since its inception was -49.74%, smaller than the maximum MEQFX drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCIX and MEQFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCIX | MEQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.74% | -55.38% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.91% | -17.43% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.48% | -17.43% | -12.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.51% | -19.48% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.51% | -28.69% | -11.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -11.64% | +6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -12.19% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.87% | 10.37% | -4.50% |
Volatility
TSCIX vs. MEQFX - Volatility Comparison
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) at 4.03%. This indicates that TSCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCIX | MEQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 4.03% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.14% | 9.51% | +6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 17.07% | +4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 17.55% | +6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 19.60% | +4.04% |
TSCIX vs. MEQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MEQFX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCIX vs. MEQFX - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSCIX nor MEQFX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEQFX AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.48% | 0.98% | 2.13% | 27.90% | 0.00% | 9.17% | 3.40% | 30.28% | 5.96% | 11.63% |
TSCIX AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 6.63% | 22.45% | 13.38% | 22.41% | 30.72% | 10.75% | 3.70% | 11.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCIX and MEQFX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSCIX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to MEQFX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCIX dropped -49.74% vs MEQFX's -55.38%.
TSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSCIX and MEQFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer