TSCIX vs. UMBHX
TSCIX (AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSCIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
TSCIX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSCIX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
UMBHX
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSCIX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TSCIX AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund | 4.06% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 6.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCIX and UMBHX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCIX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
TSCIX
UMBHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSCIX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCIX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCIX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCIX drawdown since its inception was -49.74%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCIX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCIX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.74% | -5.16% | -44.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | 0.00% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -1.30% | -10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | — | — |
Volatility
TSCIX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCIX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 33.32% | -12.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 33.32% | -9.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 33.32% | -9.64% |
TSCIX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCIX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSCIX nor UMBHX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCIX AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 6.63% | 22.45% | 13.38% | 22.41% | 30.72% | 10.75% | 3.70% | 11.91% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TSCIX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for TSCIX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer