PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCIX vs. JGMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSCIX vs. JGMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCIX achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly lower than JGMNX's 15.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TSCIX having a 11.06% annualized return and JGMNX not far ahead at 11.16%.


TSCIX

1D
0.88%
1M
4.49%
YTD
12.73%
6M
9.65%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*
11.06%

JGMNX

1D
1.13%
1M
3.77%
YTD
15.14%
6M
12.94%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
11.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCIX vs. JGMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSCIX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund
12.73%0.84%8.50%16.73%-26.42%7.34%35.36%44.90%-4.05%21.17%
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
15.14%9.78%10.55%14.83%-23.56%6.88%28.75%28.60%-5.03%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCIX and JGMNX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2012

0.94

The correlation between TSCIX and JGMNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCIX vs. JGMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCIX
TSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

JGMNX
JGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCIX vs. JGMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSCIXJGMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

2.58

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

10.58

-7.78

TSCIX vs. JGMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the JGMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCIX and JGMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSCIX vs. JGMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCIX drawdown since its inception was -49.74%, which is greater than JGMNX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCIX and JGMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCIXJGMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.74%

-39.72%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.91%

-11.03%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.48%

-23.84%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.51%

-31.74%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.51%

-39.72%

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

0.00%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-7.11%

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

2.69%

+3.06%

Volatility

TSCIX vs. JGMNX - Volatility Comparison

AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) at 5.71%. This indicates that TSCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCIXJGMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

5.71%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

13.21%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.15%

16.77%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.76%

19.71%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.68%

20.63%

+3.05%

TSCIX vs. JGMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than JGMNX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSCIX vs. JGMNX - Dividend Comparison

TSCIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JGMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
9.43%10.86%7.35%6.96%6.10%19.99%4.06%4.20%7.41%5.03%2.96%7.71%
TSCIX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.69%0.00%6.63%22.45%13.38%22.41%30.72%10.75%3.70%11.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TSCIX and JGMNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSCIX has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to JGMNX (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCIX dropped -49.74% vs JGMNX's -39.72%.

JGMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCIX and JGMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer