TRUT vs. SMH
TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRUT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VanEck, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. TRUT is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
TRUT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
TRUT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 25.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUT and SMH is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
TRUT
SMH
TRUT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRUT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.34 | +2.05 |
Drawdowns
TRUT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.55% | -84.96% | +66.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | 0.00% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -41.09% | +35.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility
TRUT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.53% | 30.56% | -9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 35.01% | -13.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 32.57% | -11.04% |
TRUT vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUT and SMH have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
TRUT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for TRUT and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer