TRUT vs. BOTZ
TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRUT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VanEck, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. TRUT is actively managed, while BOTZ is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
TRUT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 11.15% return.
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 29.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 11.15% | 10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUT and BOTZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
TRUT
BOTZ
TRUT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRUT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.44 | +1.95 |
Drawdowns
TRUT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.55% | -55.54% | +36.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -3.27% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -18.32% | +13.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.63% | — |
Volatility
TRUT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.53% | 23.98% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 26.73% | -5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 25.73% | -4.20% |
TRUT vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.59% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.
TRUT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.68% for BOTZ.
Find the right allocation for TRUT and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer