TRUT vs. ASMH

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TRUT is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

TRUT vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 61.20% return.

TRUT

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 4.27%
• 6M: 28.03%
• YTD: 21.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

ASMH

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -8.02%
• 6M: 29.69%
• YTD: 61.20%
• 1Y: 147.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 108.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	$129.75K	$234.38K	$301.43K
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	$14.62M	$8.94M	$6.29M

TRUT vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	21.07%	9.76%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	61.20%	42.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUT and ASMH is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

TRUT vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRUT vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRUT	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.41	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.91	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	24.31	—

Drawdowns

TRUT vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum ASMH drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRUT	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.55%	-21.52%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.78%	-15.85%	+11.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-4.85%	-0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRUT	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.08%	43.67%	-19.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.08%	41.62%	-17.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.08%	41.62%	-17.54%

TRUT vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRUT vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than ASMH's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.90%	0.19%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.30%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRUT and ASMH in my portfolio?

TRUT and ASMH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRUT or ASMH?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRUT or ASMH?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ASMH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRUT or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.30% for TRUT.

What is the main difference between TRUT and ASMH?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.19% for ASMH.