TRUT vs. ASMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TRUT is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

TRUT vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 63.99% return.

TRUT

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 16.68%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 6M: 24.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 25.24%
• YTD: 63.99%
• 6M: 53.18%
• 1Y: 130.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUT vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	25.30%	10.16%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	63.99%	44.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUT and ASMH is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

TRUT vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 88
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUT vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRUT	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.39	3.59	-1.20

Drawdowns

TRUT vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRUT	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.55%	-15.89%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	0.00%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.17%	-4.33%	-0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRUT	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	30.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.53%	38.94%	-17.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.53%	38.32%	-16.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.53%	38.32%	-16.79%

TRUT vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRUT vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than ASMH's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	0.99%	0.19%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.19%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRUT and ASMH in my portfolio?

TRUT and ASMH have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRUT or ASMH?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRUT or ASMH?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ASMH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRUT or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.

What is the main difference between TRUT and ASMH?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.19% for ASMH.