PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRUP vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRUP vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trupanion, Inc. (TRUP) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUP achieves a -33.32% return, which is significantly lower than CRM's -29.45% return. Over the past 10 years, TRUP has underperformed CRM with an annualized return of 5.21%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.81% annualized return.


TRUP

1D
1.76%
1M
-7.40%
6M
-21.61%
YTD
-33.32%
1Y
-46.07%
3Y*
-7.02%
5Y*
-26.34%
10Y*
5.21%
ALL TIME*
6.83%

CRM

1D
1.05%
1M
11.94%
6M
-11.34%
YTD
-29.45%
1Y
-25.21%
3Y*
-4.12%
5Y*
-4.98%
10Y*
8.81%
ALL TIME*
19.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.36B$2.19B$2.59B
$8.22M$8.34M$8.93M

TRUP vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
-33.32%-22.47%57.98%-35.81%-64.00%10.29%219.57%47.13%-13.02%88.60%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-29.45%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUP and CRM is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2014

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRUP:

$1.09B

CRM:

$152.29B

EPS

TRUP:

$0.59

CRM:

$8.68

PE Ratio

TRUP:

42.12

CRM:

21.42

PS Ratio

TRUP:

0.73

CRM:

4.01

PB Ratio

TRUP:

2.76

CRM:

4.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRUP:

$1.48B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRUP:

$571.84M

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRUP:

$57.57M

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRUP vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRUP
TRUP Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TRUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRUP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TRUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRUP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRUP vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trupanion, Inc. (TRUP) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRUPCRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.92

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.58

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-1.07

-0.13

TRUP vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRUP Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRUP and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRUP vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUP drawdown since its inception was -87.34%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUP and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRUPCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.34%

-70.50%

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.64%

-43.33%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.98%

-58.67%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.34%

-58.67%

-28.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.34%

-58.67%

-28.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.96%

-48.81%

-35.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-16.38%

-24.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.28%

23.58%

+14.70%

Volatility

TRUP vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

Trupanion, Inc. (TRUP) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) have volatilities of 14.74% and 14.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRUPCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

14.35%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.60%

33.53%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.11%

41.04%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.64%

37.79%

+33.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.51%

35.72%

+26.79%

Dividends

TRUP vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

TRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM20252024
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.92%0.63%0.48%
TRUP
Trupanion, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TRUP vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trupanion, Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

TRUP vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trupanion, Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

TRUP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trupanion, Inc. reported a gross profit of 342.93M and revenue of 384.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.3%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

TRUP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trupanion, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.78M and revenue of 384.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

TRUP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trupanion, Inc. reported a net income of 4.88M and revenue of 384.05M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TRUP and CRM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRUP has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to CRM (14.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRUP dropped -87.34% vs CRM's -70.50%.

CRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRUP and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer