TRUF vs. RSPF

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) and RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRUF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPF.

Performance

TRUF vs. RSPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TRUF

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 4.40%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPF

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 6.75%
• 6M: 5.48%
• YTD: 6.30%
• 1Y: 9.03%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 9.12%
• 10Y*: 12.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUF vs. RSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF	15.11%
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	16.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUF and RSPF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.92

Return for Risk

TRUF vs. RSPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRUF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSPF

RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 20
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 20
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUF vs. RSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRUF	RSPF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.60	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.92	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.64	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.75	—

Drawdowns

TRUF vs. RSPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUF drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum RSPF drawdown of -81.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUF and RSPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRUF	RSPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-81.32%	+78.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-0.60%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.07%	-18.93%	+17.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRUF	RSPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.68%	15.29%	-1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.68%	19.72%	-6.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.68%	22.83%	-9.15%

TRUF vs. RSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPF's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRUF vs. RSPF - Dividend Comparison

TRUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than RSPF's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	1.52%	1.55%	1.65%	2.16%	1.95%	1.56%	2.24%	1.85%	2.51%	1.28%	37.55%	2.17%
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRUF and RSPF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, TRUF and RSPF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, TRUF or RSPF?

On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRUF or RSPF?

TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRUF or RSPF?

RSPF has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.

What is the main difference between TRUF and RSPF?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRUF and 0.40% for RSPF.