TRUF vs. FDIQ
TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) and FDIQ (Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FDIQ.
Performance
TRUF vs. FDIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUF
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIQ
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 17.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
TRUF vs. FDIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 15.11% |
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 3.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUF and FDIQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUF vs. FDIQ — Risk / Return Rank
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDIQ
TRUF vs. FDIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUF | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUF vs. FDIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUF drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum FDIQ drawdown of -52.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUF and FDIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUF | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -52.86% | +49.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -4.23% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -11.53% | +10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.28% | — |
Volatility
TRUF vs. FDIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUF | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 22.03% | -8.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 28.44% | -14.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 30.98% | -17.30% |
TRUF vs. FDIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FDIQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUF vs. FDIQ - Dividend Comparison
TRUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than FDIQ's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.17% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUF and FDIQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FDIQ.
FDIQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRUF and 0.35% for FDIQ.
Find the right allocation for TRUF and FDIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer