TRUF vs. BCFN
TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) and BCFN (Baron Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRUF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BCFN.
Performance
TRUF vs. BCFN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUF
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFN
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRUF vs. BCFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 15.11% |
BCFN Baron Financials ETF | 9.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUF and BCFN is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUF vs. BCFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and Baron Financials ETF (BCFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUF vs. BCFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUF drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum BCFN drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUF and BCFN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUF | BCFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -20.95% | +17.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -11.19% | +10.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -12.70% | +11.63% |
Volatility
TRUF vs. BCFN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUF | BCFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 19.07% | -5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 19.07% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 19.07% | -5.39% |
TRUF vs. BCFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFN's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUF vs. BCFN - Dividend Comparison
TRUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while BCFN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BCFN Baron Financials ETF | 0.00% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUF and BCFN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.
TRUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for BCFN.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Baron Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRUF and 0.80% for BCFN.
Find the right allocation for TRUF and BCFN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer