PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTY vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRTY vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.


TRTY

1D
-1.75%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
6.97%
6M
6.31%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
10.40%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTY vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
6.97%16.35%3.89%3.97%-3.30%15.73%1.68%8.36%-5.78%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-33.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTY and UGA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018

0.29

The correlation between TRTY and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTY vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTY
TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTY vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRTYUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.17

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.89

9.39

+4.50

TRTY vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTY and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRTY vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTYUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.35%

-86.59%

+64.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.49%

-18.96%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

-26.68%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

-38.11%

+24.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-18.05%

+14.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-36.69%

+32.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

6.43%

-5.04%

Volatility

TRTY vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) is 3.43%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that TRTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTYUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

9.24%

-5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

30.57%

-21.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.05%

35.22%

-25.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

34.45%

-23.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.43%

37.22%

-26.79%

TRTY vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRTY vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
3.10%2.86%3.55%3.24%5.17%4.52%1.99%2.64%1.07%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRTY and UGA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to TRTY (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTY dropped -22.35% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 5.67% for TRTY. On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TRTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

TRTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while UGA is Oil & Gas. TRTY tracks Cambria Trinity Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRTY and 0.75% for UGA.

TRTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTY and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer