TRTY vs. GVAL
TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRTY is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Cambria Trinity Index, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. TRTY is passively managed, while GVAL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRTY returned 5.91%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for GVAL. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRTY charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
TRTY vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 14.37% return.
TRTY
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- —
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
TRTY vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 10.10% | 16.35% | 3.89% | 3.97% | -3.30% | 15.73% | 1.68% | 8.36% | -5.74% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 14.37% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -6.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRTY and GVAL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.63 |
The correlation between TRTY and GVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TRTY vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TRTY
GVAL
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Energy
TRTY
GVAL
Financial Services
TRTY
GVAL
Industrials
TRTY
GVAL
Basic Materials
TRTY
GVAL
Real Estate
TRTY
GVAL
Consumer Cyclical
TRTY
GVAL
Technology
TRTY
GVAL
Utilities
TRTY
GVAL
Communication Services
TRTY
GVAL
Consumer Defensive
TRTY
GVAL
Healthcare
TRTY
GVAL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRTY vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
TRTY
GVAL
TRTY vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRTY | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.50 | 2.75 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | 3.64 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.49 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 3.47 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.99 | 13.33 | +4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRTY | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.75 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.72 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.35 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
TRTY vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRTY | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -46.82% | +24.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.49% | -11.50% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | -15.72% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -30.83% | +17.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -1.24% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -13.88% | +9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 2.99% | -1.66% |
Volatility
TRTY vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) is 2.35%, while Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that TRTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRTY | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 5.10% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 12.72% | -4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.54% | 14.52% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 18.46% | -7.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 19.21% | -8.80% |
TRTY vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRTY vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than GVAL's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.83% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 3.01% | 2.86% | 3.55% | 3.24% | 5.17% | 4.52% | 1.99% | 2.64% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRTY and GVAL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to TRTY (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTY dropped -22.35% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
On 5-year performance, GVAL leads with 13.14% vs 5.91% for TRTY. On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TRTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.83% for GVAL.
TRTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while GVAL is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRTY and 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRTY and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer