PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTY vs. GMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRTY vs. GMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than GMOM's 11.55% return.


TRTY

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.96%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.29%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
11.86%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*

GMOM

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.88%
YTD
11.55%
6M
13.63%
1Y
29.29%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTY vs. GMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
10.10%16.35%3.89%3.97%-3.30%15.73%1.68%8.36%-5.74%
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
11.55%20.63%6.75%0.65%-2.82%19.13%2.42%8.24%-7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTY and GMOM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.72

The correlation between TRTY and GMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TRTY vs. GMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TRTY
GMOM

Energy

18.2%
20.7%

Financial Services

15.8%
12.0%

Industrials

13.4%
16.1%

Basic Materials

11.1%
15.6%

Real Estate

8.7%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
5.4%

Technology

7.7%
8.4%

Utilities

6.9%
11.0%

Communication Services

3.9%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.5%

Healthcare

2.6%
1.1%

Energy

TRTY
18.2%
GMOM
20.7%

Financial Services

TRTY
15.8%
GMOM
12.0%

Industrials

TRTY
13.4%
GMOM
16.1%

Basic Materials

TRTY
11.1%
GMOM
15.6%

Real Estate

TRTY
8.7%
GMOM
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TRTY
7.9%
GMOM
5.4%

Technology

TRTY
7.7%
GMOM
8.4%

Utilities

TRTY
6.9%
GMOM
11.0%

Communication Services

TRTY
3.9%
GMOM
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

TRTY
3.8%
GMOM
3.5%

Healthcare

TRTY
2.6%
GMOM
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTY vs. GMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTY
TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOM
GMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTY vs. GMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRTYGMOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

2.16

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

2.86

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

3.07

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.99

12.03

+5.95

TRTY vs. GMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the GMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTY and GMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRTYGMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.16

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.49

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.49

+0.12

Drawdowns

TRTY vs. GMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum GMOM drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and GMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTYGMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.35%

-25.03%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.49%

-9.57%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

-13.73%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

-19.16%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-2.09%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-7.81%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

2.44%

-1.11%

Volatility

TRTY vs. GMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) is 2.35%, while Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that TRTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTYGMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

3.29%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

11.18%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.54%

13.61%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.62%

14.41%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.41%

12.82%

-2.41%

TRTY vs. GMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOM's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRTY vs. GMOM - Dividend Comparison

TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than GMOM's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMOM
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
1.58%3.01%2.16%3.63%2.52%3.42%1.24%2.60%1.90%2.05%1.77%1.88%
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
3.01%2.86%3.55%3.24%5.17%4.52%1.99%2.64%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRTY and GMOM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMOM has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to TRTY (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTY dropped -22.35% vs GMOM's -25.03%.

On 5-year performance, GMOM leads with 7.01% vs 5.91% for TRTY. On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TRTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GMOM has performed better with a 7.01% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.

TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.58% for GMOM.

TRTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while GMOM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRTY and 0.96% for GMOM.

TRTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTY and GMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer