TRTY vs. BLDG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRTY is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Cambria Trinity Index, while BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria. TRTY is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRTY returned 5.91%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for BLDG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRTY charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.

Performance

TRTY vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's 5.95% return.

TRTY

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 11.29%
• 1Y: 23.79%
• 3Y*: 11.86%
• 5Y*: 5.91%
• 10Y*: —

BLDG

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTY vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF	10.10%	16.35%	3.89%	3.97%	-3.30%	15.73%	11.04%
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.95%	4.26%	8.18%	1.76%	-14.66%	22.47%	15.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTY and BLDG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020	0.59

The correlation between TRTY and BLDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TRTY vs. BLDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TRTY	BLDG
Energy	18.2%	-
Financial Services	15.8%	1.4%
Industrials	13.4%	-
Basic Materials	11.1%	-
Real Estate	8.7%	98.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	-
Technology	7.7%	-
Utilities	6.9%	-
Communication Services	3.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	-
Healthcare	2.6%	-

Return for Risk

TRTY vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTY

TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 79
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 83
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 85

BLDG

BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 25
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTY vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRTY	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	0.93	+1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	1.35	+1.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.16	+0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	1.02	+3.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.99	3.60	+14.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRTY vs. BLDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the BLDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTY and BLDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRTY	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	0.93	+1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.15	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.45	+0.16

Drawdowns

TRTY vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum BLDG drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and BLDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRTY	BLDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.35%	-27.25%	+4.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.49%	-10.08%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.25%	-18.57%	+9.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.72%	-27.25%	+13.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-2.76%	+2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-9.23%	+5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	2.86%	-1.53%

Volatility

TRTY vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) is 2.35%, while Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that TRTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRTY	BLDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.35%	3.60%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.25%	8.23%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.54%	11.07%	-1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.62%	15.26%	-4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.41%	15.54%	-5.13%

TRTY vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRTY vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than BLDG's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.72%	7.46%	7.97%	4.99%	3.99%	10.40%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF	3.01%	2.86%	3.55%	3.24%	5.17%	4.52%	1.99%	2.64%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRTY and BLDG in my portfolio?

TRTY and BLDG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRTY or BLDG?

BLDG has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to TRTY (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTY dropped -22.35% vs BLDG's -27.25%.

Which ETF is better, TRTY or BLDG?

On 5-year performance, TRTY leads with 5.91% vs 2.24% for BLDG. On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TRTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TRTY or BLDG?

Over the 5-year period, TRTY has performed better with a 5.91% return vs 2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRTY or BLDG?

TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRTY or BLDG?

BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 3.01% for TRTY.

What is the main difference between TRTY and BLDG?

TRTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while BLDG is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRTY and 0.59% for BLDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.