PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTY vs. BLDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TRTY vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TRTY vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
5.59%16.35%3.89%3.97%-3.30%15.73%11.04%
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
-0.94%4.26%8.18%1.76%-14.66%22.47%15.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's -0.94% return.


TRTY

1D
1.37%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
5.59%
6M
9.31%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*

BLDG

1D
1.25%
1M
-8.62%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-3.58%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TRTY vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TRTY vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTY
TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BLDG
BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTY vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRTYBLDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

0.46

+1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

0.71

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.09

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

0.55

+2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.32

2.04

+11.28

TRTY vs. BLDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the BLDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTY and BLDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRTYBLDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

0.46

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.15

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.38

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between TRTY and BLDG is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TRTY vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than BLDG's 6.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
3.14%2.86%3.55%3.24%5.17%4.52%1.99%2.64%1.07%
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
6.12%7.46%7.97%4.99%3.99%10.40%0.59%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TRTY vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum BLDG drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and BLDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTYBLDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.35%

-27.25%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.52%

-10.80%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

-27.25%

+13.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-8.96%

+5.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-9.44%

+5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.93%

-1.34%

Volatility

TRTY vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRTYBLDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.20%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

7.38%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.97%

13.30%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

15.24%

-4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.47%

15.61%

-5.14%