PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTX vs. EFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRTX vs. EFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than EFC's 3.50% return.


TRTX

1D
-1.41%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.32%
6M
-3.05%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*

EFC

1D
-1.76%
1M
3.68%
YTD
3.50%
6M
3.72%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTX vs. EFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRTX
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
0.32%13.50%46.93%9.71%-38.40%25.11%-31.46%20.90%4.67%0.91%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
3.50%26.13%8.68%18.16%-18.32%26.33%-10.16%32.43%17.29%-5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTX and EFC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2017

0.60

The correlation between TRTX and EFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRTX:

$662.55M

EFC:

$1.63B

EPS

TRTX:

$0.78

EFC:

$1.95

PE Ratio

TRTX:

10.80

EFC:

6.87

PS Ratio

TRTX:

2.51

EFC:

3.35

PB Ratio

TRTX:

0.62

EFC:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRTX:

$264.49M

EFC:

$417.93M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRTX:

$207.51M

EFC:

$347.01M

EBITDA (TTM)

TRTX:

$195.60M

EFC:

$270.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTX vs. EFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTX
TRTX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EFC
EFC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTX vs. EFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRTXEFCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

1.16

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.70

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.15

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.34

3.74

-0.40

TRTX vs. EFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the EFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTX and EFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRTXEFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.16

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.23

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.26

-0.22

Drawdowns

TRTX vs. EFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTX drawdown since its inception was -86.18%, which is greater than EFC's maximum drawdown of -79.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTX and EFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTXEFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.18%

-79.08%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-17.71%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.01%

-18.86%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.39%

-34.19%

-20.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-1.76%

-5.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.01%

-9.95%

-11.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.67%

5.43%

+1.24%

Volatility

TRTX vs. EFC - Volatility Comparison

TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) at 4.98%. This indicates that TRTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTXEFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

4.98%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

13.05%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

17.62%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.95%

23.96%

+10.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.83%

42.26%

+15.57%

Dividends

TRTX vs. EFC - Dividend Comparison

TRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, less than EFC's 11.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
11.68%11.49%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%
TRTX
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
11.46%11.15%11.29%14.77%14.14%7.71%15.44%8.49%9.35%3.73%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TRTX vs. EFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. and Ellington Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
11.59M
61.25M
(TRTX) Total Revenue
(EFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRTX and EFC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRTX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to EFC (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTX dropped -86.18% vs EFC's -79.08%.

EFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTX and EFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer