PortfoliosLab logo
EFC vs. GAIN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EFC and GAIN is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EFC vs. GAIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EFC:

1.12

GAIN:

0.52

Sortino Ratio

EFC:

1.68

GAIN:

0.97

Omega Ratio

EFC:

1.24

GAIN:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

EFC:

1.27

GAIN:

0.90

Martin Ratio

EFC:

4.32

GAIN:

2.90

Ulcer Index

EFC:

5.52%

GAIN:

4.57%

Daily Std Dev

EFC:

21.24%

GAIN:

23.87%

Max Drawdown

EFC:

-79.08%

GAIN:

-80.88%

Current Drawdown

EFC:

-7.39%

GAIN:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFC:

$1.24B

GAIN:

$526.77M

EPS

EFC:

$1.39

GAIN:

$1.91

PE Ratio

EFC:

9.40

GAIN:

7.49

PEG Ratio

EFC:

0.86

GAIN:

5.46

PS Ratio

EFC:

4.01

GAIN:

5.91

PB Ratio

EFC:

0.96

GAIN:

1.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFC:

$189.30M

GAIN:

$78.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFC:

$153.42M

GAIN:

$78.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

EFC:

$216.47M

GAIN:

$64.91M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFC achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than GAIN's 10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EFC has underperformed GAIN with an annualized return of 7.45%, while GAIN has yielded a comparatively higher 17.71% annualized return.


EFC

YTD

11.89%

1M

10.12%

6M

13.45%

1Y

23.65%

5Y*

19.55%

10Y*

7.45%

GAIN

YTD

10.50%

1M

6.87%

6M

8.16%

1Y

12.28%

5Y*

19.17%

10Y*

17.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EFC vs. GAIN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFC is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFC is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFC is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFC is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFC is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GAIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GAIN is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GAIN is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GAIN is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GAIN is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GAIN is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GAIN is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EFC vs. GAIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the GAIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFC and GAIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EFC vs. GAIN - Dividend Comparison

EFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.97%, more than GAIN's 11.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
11.97%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%15.43%
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corporation
11.61%12.53%17.24%9.88%6.06%9.22%7.74%9.88%7.94%8.87%9.68%11.00%

Drawdowns

EFC vs. GAIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFC drawdown since its inception was -79.08%, roughly equal to the maximum GAIN drawdown of -80.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFC and GAIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EFC vs. GAIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) is 5.28%, while Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that EFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EFC vs. GAIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ellington Financial Inc. and Gladstone Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
66.08M
35.69M
(EFC) Total Revenue
(GAIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items