EFC vs. NLY
EFC (Ellington Financial Inc.) and NLY (Annaly Capital Management, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, EFC returned 9.28%/yr vs 6.03%/yr for NLY. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
EFC vs. NLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFC achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than NLY's 8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EFC has outperformed NLY with an annualized return of 9.28%, while NLY has yielded a comparatively lower 6.03% annualized return.
EFC
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 17.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.33%
NLY
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 26.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- 6.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.71M | $15.05M | $17.24M | |
| $189.27M | $166.36M | $168.00M |
EFC vs. NLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFC Ellington Financial Inc. | 4.88% | 26.13% | 8.68% | 18.16% | -18.32% | 26.33% | -10.16% | 32.43% | 17.29% | 4.34% |
NLY Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | 8.59% | 40.00% | 8.07% | 4.94% | -21.41% | 2.48% | 2.38% | 7.22% | -7.22% | 31.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFC and NLY is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2010 | 0.53 |
The correlation between EFC and NLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFC:
$1.42B
NLY:
$17.05B
EFC:
$1.89
NLY:
$4.25
EFC:
7.02
NLY:
5.34
EFC:
3.42
NLY:
4.61
EFC:
0.95
NLY:
1.10
EFC:
$417.93M
NLY:
$3.42B
EFC:
$347.01M
NLY:
$3.40B
EFC:
$270.77M
NLY:
$8.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFC vs. NLY — Risk / Return Rank
EFC
NLY
EFC vs. NLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFC | NLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.85 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | 5.29 | -2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFC vs. NLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFC drawdown since its inception was -79.08%, which is greater than NLY's maximum drawdown of -60.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFC and NLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFC | NLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.08% | -60.09% | -18.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.71% | -14.88% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.86% | -26.28% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.19% | -50.21% | +16.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.08% | -60.09% | -18.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -2.99% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.85% | -13.78% | +3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 5.20% | +0.21% |
Volatility
EFC vs. NLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) is 3.69%, while Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that EFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFC | NLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 6.05% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.01% | 15.18% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 19.60% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 25.52% | -1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.28% | 28.19% | +14.09% |
Dividends
EFC vs. NLY - Dividend Comparison
EFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, less than NLY's 12.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFC Ellington Financial Inc. | 11.75% | 11.49% | 13.20% | 14.16% | 14.55% | 9.60% | 8.49% | 9.87% | 10.70% | 12.13% | 12.56% | 14.60% |
NLY Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | 12.54% | 12.52% | 14.21% | 13.42% | 16.70% | 11.25% | 10.77% | 11.15% | 12.22% | 10.09% | 12.04% | 12.79% |
Financials
EFC vs. NLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ellington Financial Inc. and Annaly Capital Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EFC and NLY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLY has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to EFC (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFC dropped -79.08% vs NLY's -60.09%.
NLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFC and NLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer