PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EFC vs. NLY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


EFCNLY
YTD Return9.02%13.03%
1Y Return15.31%34.11%
3Y Return (Ann)0.18%-4.59%
5Y Return (Ann)3.45%0.73%
10Y Return (Ann)6.13%3.94%
Sharpe Ratio0.641.48
Sortino Ratio0.962.06
Omega Ratio1.131.26
Calmar Ratio0.630.78
Martin Ratio2.658.73
Ulcer Index5.04%3.44%
Daily Std Dev20.85%20.33%
Max Drawdown-79.08%-60.09%
Current Drawdown-4.89%-17.50%

Fundamentals


EFCNLY
Market Cap$1.13B$11.12B
EPS$1.29-$0.08
PEG Ratio0.86-3.61
Total Revenue (TTM)$330.89M$680.19M
Gross Profit (TTM)$260.82M$641.92M
EBITDA (TTM)$170.03M$3.57B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between EFC and NLY is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

EFC vs. NLY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EFC achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly lower than NLY's 13.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EFC has outperformed NLY with an annualized return of 6.13%, while NLY has yielded a comparatively lower 3.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.05%
6.03%
EFC
NLY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EFC vs. NLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EFC, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EFC, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EFC, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EFC, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EFC, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.65
NLY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NLY, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NLY, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NLY, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NLY, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NLY, currently valued at 8.73, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.73

EFC vs. NLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the NLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFC and NLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.64
1.48
EFC
NLY

Dividends

EFC vs. NLY - Dividend Comparison

EFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.20%, which matches NLY's 13.11% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%15.43%16.89%
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
13.11%13.42%16.70%11.25%10.77%11.15%12.22%10.09%12.04%12.79%11.10%15.05%

Drawdowns

EFC vs. NLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFC drawdown since its inception was -79.08%, which is greater than NLY's maximum drawdown of -60.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFC and NLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.89%
-17.50%
EFC
NLY

Volatility

EFC vs. NLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) is 4.97%, while Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that EFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.97%
5.46%
EFC
NLY

Financials

EFC vs. NLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ellington Financial Inc. and Annaly Capital Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items