PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTX vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRTX vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 104.63% return.


TRTX

1D
-1.41%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.32%
6M
-3.05%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*

VRT

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.14%
YTD
104.63%
6M
85.33%
1Y
195.39%
3Y*
156.10%
5Y*
67.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTX vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TRTX
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
0.32%13.50%46.93%9.71%-38.40%25.11%-31.46%20.90%-7.51%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
104.63%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTX and VRT is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018

0.28

The correlation between TRTX and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRTX:

$662.55M

VRT:

$129.97B

EPS

TRTX:

$0.78

VRT:

$3.99

PE Ratio

TRTX:

10.80

VRT:

83.15

PS Ratio

TRTX:

2.51

VRT:

11.95

PB Ratio

TRTX:

0.62

VRT:

30.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRTX:

$264.49M

VRT:

$10.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRTX:

$207.51M

VRT:

$3.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRTX:

$195.60M

VRT:

$2.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTX vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTX
TRTX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTX vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRTXVRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

3.42

-2.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

3.75

-2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.47

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

7.94

-6.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.34

22.67

-19.32

TRTX vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTX and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRTXVRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

3.42

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

1.10

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

1.04

-1.00

Drawdowns

TRTX vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTX drawdown since its inception was -86.18%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTX and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTXVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.18%

-71.24%

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-24.78%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.01%

-61.28%

+31.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.39%

-71.24%

+16.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-11.90%

+4.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.01%

-16.22%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.67%

8.66%

-1.99%

Volatility

TRTX vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) is 5.40%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.92%. This indicates that TRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTXVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

16.92%

-11.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

44.82%

-30.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

57.51%

-37.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.95%

61.71%

-26.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.83%

54.58%

+3.25%

Dividends

TRTX vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

TRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, more than VRT's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRTX
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
11.46%11.15%11.29%14.77%14.14%7.71%15.44%8.49%9.35%3.73%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.06%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TRTX vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
11.59M
2.65B
(TRTX) Total Revenue
(VRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRTX and VRT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (16.92%) compared to TRTX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTX dropped -86.18% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTX and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer