TRT vs. AEHR
TRT (Trio-Tech International) and AEHR (Aehr Test Systems) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, TRT returned 21.77%/yr vs 50.48%/yr for AEHR. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRT vs. AEHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRT achieves a 101.96% return, which is significantly lower than AEHR's 407.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TRT has underperformed AEHR with an annualized return of 21.77%, while AEHR has yielded a comparatively higher 50.48% annualized return.
TRT
- 1D
- -7.79%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- 101.96%
- 6M
- 110.55%
- 1Y
- 402.63%
- 3Y*
- 77.15%
- 5Y*
- 38.54%
- 10Y*
- 21.77%
AEHR
- 1D
- -9.65%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 407.13%
- 6M
- 349.67%
- 1Y
- 810.13%
- 3Y*
- 36.85%
- 5Y*
- 107.37%
- 10Y*
- 50.48%
TRT vs. AEHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRT Trio-Tech International | 101.96% | 127.88% | 14.60% | 12.66% | -66.49% | 239.01% | -0.71% | 62.20% | -64.91% | 111.35% |
AEHR Aehr Test Systems | 407.13% | 21.41% | -37.32% | 31.99% | -16.87% | 855.73% | 26.50% | 41.84% | -47.97% | 12.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRT and AEHR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1997 | 0.10 |
Over the past year, TRT and AEHR have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
TRT:
$130.33M
AEHR:
$3.14B
TRT:
$0.07
AEHR:
-$0.38
TRT:
2.87
AEHR:
68.38
TRT:
3.80
AEHR:
22.64
TRT:
$41.83M
AEHR:
$45.26M
TRT:
$10.27M
AEHR:
$13.90M
TRT:
$2.03M
AEHR:
-$13.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRT vs. AEHR — Risk / Return Rank
TRT
AEHR
TRT vs. AEHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trio-Tech International (TRT) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRT | AEHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.51 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.85 | 19.34 | -11.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.83 | 43.44 | -21.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRT vs. AEHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRT drawdown since its inception was -95.03%, roughly equal to the maximum AEHR drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRT and AEHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRT | AEHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.03% | -97.98% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.72% | -42.31% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.72% | -87.37% | +35.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.77% | -87.37% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.64% | -87.37% | +16.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.32% | -12.17% | -21.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.01% | -79.53% | +11.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.55% | 18.80% | -0.25% |
Volatility
TRT vs. AEHR - Volatility Comparison
Trio-Tech International (TRT) has a higher volatility of 43.18% compared to Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) at 38.64%. This indicates that TRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRT | AEHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.18% | 38.64% | +4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 109.89% | 88.90% | +20.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 127.11% | 119.59% | +7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.77% | 110.16% | -29.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.37% | 94.02% | -25.65% |
Dividends
TRT vs. AEHR - Dividend Comparison
Neither TRT nor AEHR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TRT vs. AEHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trio-Tech International and Aehr Test Systems. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TRT and AEHR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRT has higher volatility (43.18%) compared to AEHR (38.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRT dropped -95.03% vs AEHR's -97.98%.
AEHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.84 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRT and AEHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer