PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRT vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRT vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trio-Tech International (TRT) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRT achieves a 50.76% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return. Over the past 10 years, TRT has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 19.08%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 51.33% annualized return.


TRT

1D
1.11%
1M
-10.09%
6M
77.26%
YTD
50.76%
1Y
266.91%
3Y*
51.59%
5Y*
32.65%
10Y*
19.08%
ALL TIME*
7.24%

MU

1D
-5.90%
1M
-20.26%
6M
98.49%
YTD
188.53%
1Y
655.32%
3Y*
127.41%
5Y*
61.18%
10Y*
51.33%
ALL TIME*
17.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.28B$42.78B$49.13B
$3.65M$4.73M$11.73M

TRT vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRT
Trio-Tech International
50.76%127.88%14.60%12.66%-66.49%239.01%-0.71%62.20%-64.91%111.35%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
188.53%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TRT and MU is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 1995

0.09

The correlation between TRT and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRT:

$100.92M

MU:

$929.52B

EPS

TRT:

$0.07

MU:

$44.42

PE Ratio

TRT:

141.58

MU:

18.53

PEG Ratio

TRT:

15.62

MU:

0.07

PS Ratio

TRT:

2.16

MU:

10.36

PB Ratio

TRT:

2.83

MU:

9.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRT:

$41.83M

MU:

$90.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRT:

$10.27M

MU:

$65.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRT:

$2.03M

MU:

$44.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRT vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRT
TRT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRT vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trio-Tech International (TRT) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRTMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.63

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.92

16.92

-12.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

64.08

-52.99

TRT vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 8.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRT and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRT vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRT drawdown since its inception was -95.03%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRT and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.03%

-98.25%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.61%

-39.10%

-15.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.61%

-57.63%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.77%

-57.63%

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.64%

-57.63%

-13.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.22%

-32.17%

-18.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.94%

-58.02%

-9.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.19%

10.31%

+13.88%

Volatility

TRT vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trio-Tech International (TRT) is 28.00%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that TRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.00%

31.11%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

110.80%

67.64%

+43.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

129.61%

81.13%

+48.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.79%

56.32%

+25.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.79%

51.42%

+17.37%

Dividends

TRT vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

TRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.06%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
TRT
Trio-Tech International
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TRT vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trio-Tech International and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRT and MU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to TRT (28.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRT dropped -95.03% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRT and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer