TRSPX vs. NSBRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX).
TRSPX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. NSBRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 28, 2006.
Performance
TRSPX vs. NSBRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRSPX vs. NSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRSPX Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class | -4.40% | 17.50% | 24.64% | 25.90% | -18.34% | 28.32% | 18.08% | 31.06% | -4.72% | 19.52% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | -2.40% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRSPX achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than NSBRX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TRSPX has outperformed NSBRX with an annualized return of 13.56%, while NSBRX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.44% annualized return.
TRSPX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 6M
- -2.31%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
NSBRX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRSPX vs. NSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRSPX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NSBRX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRSPX vs. NSBRX — Risk / Return Rank
TRSPX
NSBRX
TRSPX vs. NSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRSPX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.61 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 0.97 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.82 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 3.53 | +2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRSPX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.61 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.66 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRSPX and NSBRX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRSPX vs. NSBRX - Dividend Comparison
TRSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than NSBRX's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRSPX Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class | 2.25% | 2.15% | 1.30% | 1.26% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.33% | 1.95% | 2.67% | 0.36% | 2.18% | 0.65% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Drawdowns
TRSPX vs. NSBRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRSPX drawdown since its inception was -55.34%, which is greater than NSBRX's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSPX and NSBRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRSPX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.34% | -45.14% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -10.75% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.63% | -19.79% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.77% | -33.69% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.27% | -6.10% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.95% | -5.28% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.50% | +0.03% |
Volatility
TRSPX vs. NSBRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) at 4.11%. This indicates that TRSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRSPX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 4.11% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 7.73% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.32% | 15.14% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 14.29% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.59% | +1.45% |