PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRSPX vs. PLFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRSPX vs. PLFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) and Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional (PLFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TRSPX having a 11.22% return and PLFIX slightly higher at 11.31%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRSPX having a 15.05% annualized return and PLFIX not far ahead at 15.54%.


TRSPX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.09%
YTD
11.22%
6M
10.85%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
15.05%

PLFIX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.09%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.01%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSPX vs. PLFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRSPX
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class
11.22%17.50%24.64%25.90%-18.34%28.32%18.08%31.06%-4.72%19.52%
PLFIX
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional
11.31%17.77%26.77%26.00%-18.21%28.25%18.11%31.35%-4.66%21.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSPX and PLFIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2002

0.99

The correlation between TRSPX and PLFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRSPX vs. PLFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSPX
TRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PLFIX
PLFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PLFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PLFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSPX vs. PLFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) and Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional (PLFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRSPXPLFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.21

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.79

15.00

-0.21

TRSPX vs. PLFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the PLFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSPX and PLFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRSPXPLFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.41

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.84

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.89

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.49

+0.09

Drawdowns

TRSPX vs. PLFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSPX drawdown since its inception was -55.34%, roughly equal to the maximum PLFIX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSPX and PLFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRSPXPLFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.34%

-55.28%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-8.90%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-18.77%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.63%

-24.58%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.77%

-33.77%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.33%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-8.85%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.90%

+0.01%

Volatility

TRSPX vs. PLFIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) and Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional (PLFIX) have volatilities of 2.86% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRSPXPLFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.86%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

8.99%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.89%

11.87%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

16.91%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.51%

+0.54%

TRSPX vs. PLFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSPX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFIX's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRSPX vs. PLFIX - Dividend Comparison

TRSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than PLFIX's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLFIX
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index Fund Institutional
2.65%2.95%4.28%4.13%2.96%13.60%7.57%3.83%7.52%7.01%3.23%2.69%
TRSPX
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class
1.93%2.15%1.30%1.26%1.66%1.55%1.33%1.95%2.67%0.36%2.18%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TRSPX and PLFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLFIX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to TRSPX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRSPX dropped -55.34% vs PLFIX's -55.28%.

PLFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRSPX and PLFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer