PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRSGX vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRSGX vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund (TRSGX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSGX achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.45% return. Over the past 10 years, TRSGX has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.34%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.77% annualized return.


TRSGX

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.18%
YTD
8.92%
6M
9.47%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
10.34%

SPMO

1D
-1.46%
1M
10.84%
YTD
28.45%
6M
27.50%
1Y
43.92%
3Y*
42.27%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
20.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSGX vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRSGX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund
8.92%17.00%12.40%18.04%-19.70%14.03%16.66%24.69%-6.02%20.56%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.45%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSGX and SPMO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.74

The correlation between TRSGX and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRSGX vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSGX
TRSGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TRSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSGX vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund (TRSGX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRSGXSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

3.47

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.50

13.52

-2.02

TRSGX vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSGX and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRSGXSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.49

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.25

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

1.03

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.00

-0.42

Drawdowns

TRSGX vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSGX drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSGX and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRSGXSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.79%

-30.95%

-20.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-12.70%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.78%

-20.13%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.83%

-22.74%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.62%

-30.95%

+1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-1.46%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-4.60%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

3.26%

-1.38%

Volatility

TRSGX vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund (TRSGX) is 3.10%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that TRSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRSGXSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

7.39%

-4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

14.49%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

17.70%

-7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.81%

19.30%

-6.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

20.31%

-6.49%

TRSGX vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSGX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRSGX vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

TRSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
TRSGX
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund
6.13%6.68%6.48%1.84%7.61%9.36%2.60%3.51%7.11%3.57%2.20%6.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRSGX and SPMO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to TRSGX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRSGX dropped -51.79% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRSGX and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer