PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRSG.L vs. IB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRSG.L vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRSG.L is traded in GBp, while IB01.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IB01.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSG.L achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than IB01.L's 1.83% return.


TRSG.L

1D
0.21%
1M
0.99%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
0.25%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*

IB01.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.53%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.05%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
2.09%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSG.L vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRSG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.08%-0.91%2.57%-1.87%-1.86%-1.12%4.13%5.34%
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.83%-3.10%7.09%-0.32%13.10%0.95%-2.08%0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSG.L and IB01.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

0.66

The correlation between TRSG.L and IB01.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRSG.L vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSG.L
TRSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IB01.L
IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSG.L vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRSG.LIB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

0.96

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

2.60

-0.52

TRSG.L vs. IB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the IB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSG.L and IB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRSG.LIB01.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.75

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.53

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.26

-0.19

Drawdowns

TRSG.L vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.68%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSG.L and IB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRSG.LIB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.68%

-19.26%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.24%

-5.16%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.17%

-9.81%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.12%

-15.94%

-0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.65%

-6.08%

-12.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.47%

-9.35%

-6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.90%

+0.28%

Volatility

TRSG.L vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L) is 1.47%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) has a volatility of 1.80%. This indicates that TRSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRSG.LIB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

1.80%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.45%

4.96%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

6.60%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.71%

8.47%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.42%

8.81%

+0.61%

TRSG.L vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSG.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRSG.L vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison

TRSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, while IB01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRSG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.24%4.22%4.16%3.85%1.94%1.12%1.69%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRSG.L and IB01.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRSG.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRSG.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IB01.L.

TRSG.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRSG.L and 0.07% for IB01.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRSG.L and IB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer