TRSG.L vs. MINT
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A (TRSG.L) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT).
TRSG.L and MINT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRSG.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Jan 11, 2019. MINT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 16, 2009.
Performance
TRSG.L vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRSG.L vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRSG.L Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A | 0.91% | -0.91% | 2.57% | -1.87% | -1.86% | -1.12% | 4.13% | 4.56% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 2.63% | -2.72% | 7.79% | 0.94% | 10.76% | 0.91% | -1.37% | 0.15% |
Different Trading Currencies
TRSG.L is traded in GBp, while MINT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MINT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRSG.L achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 2.63% return.
TRSG.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 0.01%
- 3Y*
- 0.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
MINT
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRSG.L vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRSG.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRSG.L vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
TRSG.L
MINT
TRSG.L vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A (TRSG.L) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRSG.L | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | 0.27 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.05 | 0.43 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.05 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 0.31 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | 0.59 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRSG.L | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 0.27 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.50 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.40 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRSG.L and MINT is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TRSG.L vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
TRSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than MINT's 4.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRSG.L Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A | 4.20% | 4.22% | 4.16% | 3.85% | 1.94% | 1.12% | 1.69% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.44% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Drawdowns
TRSG.L vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.68%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -15.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSG.L and MINT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRSG.L | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.68% | -4.62% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.38% | -0.16% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.12% | -2.42% | -13.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.85% | 0.00% | -17.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -0.17% | -15.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 0.02% | +4.24% |
Volatility
TRSG.L vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A (TRSG.L) is 2.06%, while PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that TRSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRSG.L | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 2.56% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.49% | 4.84% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.17% | 7.29% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 8.48% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.49% | 9.44% | +0.05% |