TRRLX vs. FFFCX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX).
TRRLX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Date 2060 Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2014. FFFCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 17, 1996.
Performance
TRRLX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRRLX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRRLX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund | -0.11% | 14.54% | 14.22% | 20.87% | -19.22% | 17.50% | 18.46% | 25.39% | -7.62% | 20.79% |
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 0.74% | 11.39% | 5.26% | 9.82% | -13.21% | 5.64% | 11.09% | 14.34% | -3.74% | 12.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRRLX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than FFFCX's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRLX has outperformed FFFCX with an annualized return of 10.20%, while FFFCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.55% annualized return.
TRRLX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- 13.32%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
FFFCX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRRLX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRRLX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRRLX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank
TRRLX
FFFCX
TRRLX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRRLX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.74 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 2.42 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 2.48 | -1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 9.70 | -5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRRLX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.74 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.51 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.89 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.67 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRRLX and FFFCX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRRLX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison
TRRLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRRLX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.74% | 3.29% | 5.75% | 4.19% | 2.38% | 4.33% | 5.39% | 1.58% | 1.58% | 0.83% |
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 4.93% | 4.97% | 2.99% | 2.72% | 7.23% | 9.33% | 6.01% | 5.78% | 6.98% | 4.82% | 3.22% | 3.68% |
Drawdowns
TRRLX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRRLX drawdown since its inception was -32.52%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRLX and FFFCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRRLX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.52% | -36.88% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -4.00% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -18.35% | -9.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.52% | -18.35% | -14.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | -2.49% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -4.60% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 1.02% | +1.96% |
Volatility
TRRLX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 2.50%. This indicates that TRRLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRRLX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 2.50% | +3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 3.57% | +6.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 5.57% | +11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 6.33% | +8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 6.28% | +9.19% |