PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRIX vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRIX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund (TRRIX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRIX achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRIX has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 6.58%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


TRRIX

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.41%
6M
2.65%
YTD
4.80%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
6.58%
ALL TIME*
6.30%

FBND

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
-0.33%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
2.27%
ALL TIME*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$133.84M$127.41M$124.15M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TRRIX vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRIX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund
4.80%9.39%10.98%14.41%-13.16%8.63%11.48%15.32%-3.29%10.38%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
-0.33%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRIX and FBND is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014

0.32

Over the past year, TRRIX and FBND have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRIX vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRRIX
TRRIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TRRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRRIX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund (TRRIX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRRIXFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.13

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.09

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.73

2.77

+3.96

TRRIX vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRIX and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRRIX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRIX drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRIX and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRIXFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.77%

-17.25%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-2.66%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-4.95%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-17.25%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.57%

-17.25%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-2.24%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-3.32%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.05%

+0.16%

Volatility

TRRIX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund (TRRIX) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 0.95%. This indicates that TRRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRIXFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

0.95%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.12%

2.94%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.43%

3.77%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

5.93%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

6.10%

+1.13%

TRRIX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRIX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

TRRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than FBND's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.77%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
TRRIX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund
3.26%3.38%6.69%6.80%10.15%12.67%9.27%3.39%7.01%5.07%3.40%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRRIX and FBND have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRRIX has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to FBND (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRIX dropped -27.77% vs FBND's -17.25%.

TRRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRIX and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer