TRRGX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TRRGX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, TRRGX returned 4.07%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for FRQHX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRRGX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

TRRGX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund (TRRGX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRGX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 3.71% return.

TRRGX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 7.55%
• 3Y*: 9.17%
• 5Y*: 4.07%
• 10Y*: 6.76%

FRQHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 3.71%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: 9.32%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRGX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TRRGX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund	5.77%	6.04%	8.85%	13.01%	-14.10%	9.65%	12.56%	5.05%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRGX and FRQHX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.84

The correlation between TRRGX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TRRGX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRGX

TRRGX Risk / Return Rank: 14
TRRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TRRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TRRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
TRRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TRRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FRQHX

FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRGX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund (TRRGX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRRGX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	2.26	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	3.27	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.45	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	2.88	-1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.30	12.04	-8.74

TRRGX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRGX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRRGX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRGX drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRGX and FRQHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRRGX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.17%	-16.90%	-26.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.30%	-3.41%	-3.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.47%	-5.15%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.89%	-16.90%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-0.41%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-3.77%	-0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	0.81%	+1.64%

Volatility

TRRGX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund (TRRGX) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 2.04%. This indicates that TRRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRRGX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.61%	2.04%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	3.70%	+3.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.42%	4.36%	+4.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.71%	5.60%	+3.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.70%	5.77%	+2.93%

TRRGX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRGX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRRGX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

TRRGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.40%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRRGX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.00%	5.52%	12.45%	11.34%	9.02%	5.24%	10.35%	7.28%	1.62%	3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRRGX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

TRRGX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRRGX or FRQHX?

TRRGX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to FRQHX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRGX dropped -43.17% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.