PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRGX vs. VTWNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRGX vs. VTWNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund (TRRGX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2020 Fund (VTWNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRGX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly higher than VTWNX's 4.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRRGX having a 6.76% annualized return and VTWNX not far ahead at 6.98%.


TRRGX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.79%
YTD
5.77%
6M
5.53%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
6.76%

VTWNX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.74%
6M
4.58%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
6.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRGX vs. VTWNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund
5.77%6.04%8.85%13.01%-14.10%9.65%12.56%17.41%-4.24%13.36%
VTWNX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2020 Fund
4.74%12.17%7.57%12.71%-14.17%8.15%12.05%17.64%-4.23%11.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRGX and VTWNX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2006

0.98

The correlation between TRRGX and VTWNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRGX vs. VTWNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRGX
TRRGX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TRRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWNX
VTWNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VTWNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRGX vs. VTWNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund (TRRGX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2020 Fund (VTWNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRRGXVTWNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.85

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

12.24

-8.94

TRRGX vs. VTWNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the VTWNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRGX and VTWNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRRGX vs. VTWNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRGX drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWNX drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRGX and VTWNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRGXVTWNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.17%

-42.16%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-4.43%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-6.20%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

-19.38%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.31%

-19.38%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.35%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-4.79%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.03%

+1.42%

Volatility

TRRGX vs. VTWNX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund (TRRGX) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to Vanguard Target Retirement 2020 Fund (VTWNX) at 2.23%. This indicates that TRRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTWNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRGXVTWNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.23%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

4.74%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.42%

5.64%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.71%

7.44%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.70%

8.29%

+0.41%

TRRGX vs. VTWNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRGX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWNX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRGX vs. VTWNX - Dividend Comparison

TRRGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTWNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRRGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund
0.00%0.00%4.00%5.52%12.45%11.34%9.02%5.24%10.35%7.28%1.62%3.07%
VTWNX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2020 Fund
7.83%8.20%9.35%6.20%4.99%19.57%6.28%3.54%4.94%0.73%2.74%4.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TRRGX and VTWNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRRGX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to VTWNX (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRGX dropped -43.17% vs VTWNX's -42.16%.

VTWNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRGX and VTWNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer