TRRDX vs. EQPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX).
TRRDX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 29, 2002. EQPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 22, 1983.
Performance
TRRDX vs. EQPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRRDX vs. EQPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRRDX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund | -0.09% | 12.53% | 13.15% | 19.60% | -18.77% | 16.52% | 18.10% | 24.71% | -7.41% | 22.03% |
EQPGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I | -4.21% | 14.60% | 29.99% | 35.60% | -24.45% | 22.94% | 43.80% | 34.01% | 0.17% | 35.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRRDX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly higher than EQPGX's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRDX has underperformed EQPGX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while EQPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.20% annualized return.
TRRDX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- 11.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
EQPGX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 17.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRRDX vs. EQPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRRDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than EQPGX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRRDX vs. EQPGX — Risk / Return Rank
TRRDX
EQPGX
TRRDX vs. EQPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRRDX | EQPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.87 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.54 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.95 | 5.37 | -1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRRDX | EQPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.87 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.60 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRRDX and EQPGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRRDX vs. EQPGX - Dividend Comparison
TRRDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRRDX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.26% | 5.60% | 8.92% | 7.92% | 4.96% | 6.10% | 9.51% | 3.96% | 3.36% | 4.61% |
EQPGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I | 0.55% | 0.52% | 10.64% | 0.48% | 1.96% | 11.42% | 10.84% | 8.56% | 6.43% | 11.57% | 5.90% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
TRRDX vs. EQPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRRDX drawdown since its inception was -53.50%, smaller than the maximum EQPGX drawdown of -62.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRDX and EQPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRRDX | EQPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.50% | -62.00% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -12.57% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.26% | -29.81% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.46% | -31.11% | -0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -7.64% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -13.80% | +7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.66% | -0.90% |
Volatility
TRRDX vs. EQPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) is 5.30%, while Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that TRRDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRRDX | EQPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 7.79% | -2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 13.37% | -4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 21.86% | -6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 20.16% | -6.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 20.49% | -5.89% |