TRPA vs. AAAC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TRPA (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRPA charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AAAC.

Performance

TRPA vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRPA achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than AAAC's 2.06% return.

TRPA

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRPA vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	1.92%	0.51%
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TRPA and AAAC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

TRPA vs. AAAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRPA

TRPA Risk / Return Rank: 83
TRPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TRPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
TRPA Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TRPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TRPA Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRPA vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRPA	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.84	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	35.98	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRPA	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.56	5.59	-3.03

Drawdowns

TRPA vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRPA drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, which is greater than AAAC's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRPA and AAAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRPA	AAAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-0.55%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-0.04%	-0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRPA	AAAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.28%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34%	0.89%	+1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.38%	0.89%	+1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.38%	0.89%	+1.49%

TRPA vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRPA has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAC's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRPA vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison

TRPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than AAAC's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	5.19%	4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRPA and AAAC in my portfolio?

TRPA and AAAC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRPA or AAAC?

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRPA or AAAC?

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for TRPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRPA or AAAC?

TRPA has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between TRPA and AAAC?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for TRPA and 0.20% for AAAC.