TRP.TO vs. DBMF
TRP.TO (TC Energy Corporation) is a stock, while DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Over the past 5 years, TRP.TO returned 14.85%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRP.TO vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TRP.TO is traded in CAD, while DBMF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBMF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRP.TO achieves a 29.69% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 12.50% return.
TRP.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 29.69%
- 6M
- 31.68%
- 1Y
- 50.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 30.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
TRP.TO vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRP.TO TC Energy Corporation | 29.69% | 18.35% | 37.67% | 2.53% | -2.77% | 20.34% | -20.74% | 13.85% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.50% | 8.65% | 16.32% | -11.10% | 29.31% | 11.44% | -0.61% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRP.TO and DBMF is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRP.TO vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
TRP.TO
DBMF
TRP.TO vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRP.TO | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.44 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 5.17 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.62 | 18.92 | -2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRP.TO vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRP.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -21.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRP.TO and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRP.TO | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.30% | -21.87% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -5.87% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.48% | -13.28% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.02% | -21.87% | -12.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -1.00% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.45% | -7.44% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 1.60% | +1.48% |
Volatility
TRP.TO vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.95%. This indicates that TRP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRP.TO | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 2.95% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 10.89% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 13.21% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 14.04% | +5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 14.05% | +9.18% |
Dividends
TRP.TO vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
TRP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than DBMF's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.19% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRP.TO TC Energy Corporation | 3.53% | 4.50% | 5.40% | 6.71% | 6.67% | 5.92% | 6.26% | 4.34% | 5.66% | 4.09% | 3.73% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRP.TO and DBMF have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TRP.TO and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer