TRMCX vs. FGSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX).
TRMCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 28, 1996. FGSAX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Aug 23, 1984.
Performance
TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 3.51% | 10.55% | 16.21% | 18.99% | -4.16% | 24.51% | 9.84% | 19.59% | -10.66% | 11.59% |
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | -6.56% | 10.54% | 32.97% | 27.05% | -24.60% | 22.39% | 35.50% | 27.95% | -3.23% | 24.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRMCX achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than FGSAX's -6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX has underperformed FGSAX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while FGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.
TRMCX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
FGSAX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -6.56%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 11.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRMCX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FGSAX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRMCX vs. FGSAX — Risk / Return Rank
TRMCX
FGSAX
TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRMCX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.57 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 0.97 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 0.65 | +0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 2.04 | +2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRMCX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.57 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.43 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.62 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.47 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMCX and FGSAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Dividend Comparison
TRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than FGSAX's 5.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 9.17% | 9.49% | 14.20% | 7.65% | 13.92% | 9.22% | 3.79% | 4.25% | 12.13% | 6.58% | 6.74% | 11.39% |
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 5.27% | 4.92% | 4.32% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 25.75% | 7.07% | 8.13% | 14.46% | 13.93% | 0.89% | 25.34% |
Drawdowns
TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum FGSAX drawdown of -66.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and FGSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMCX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -66.17% | +10.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -13.73% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.60% | -35.79% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.41% | -37.19% | -2.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -10.89% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -16.19% | +9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 4.41% | -0.70% |
Volatility
TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) is 5.95%, while Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that TRMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRMCX | FGSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 6.50% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 14.19% | -3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 20.64% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 22.43% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 22.32% | -2.67% |