TRMCX vs. FGSAX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TRMCX (T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund) and FGSAX (Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - TRMCX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while FGSAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX returned 11.32%/yr vs 14.96%/yr for FGSAX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRMCX charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for FGSAX.

Performance

TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMCX achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly higher than FGSAX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX has underperformed FGSAX with an annualized return of 11.32%, while FGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.96% annualized return.

TRMCX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 15.79%
• 6M: 15.10%
• 1Y: 27.64%
• 3Y*: 18.13%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: 11.32%

FGSAX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 3.46%
• 3Y*: 19.43%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 14.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund	15.79%	6.16%	16.21%	18.99%	-4.16%	24.51%	9.84%	19.59%	-10.66%	11.59%
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.85%	10.54%	32.97%	27.05%	-24.60%	22.39%	35.50%	27.95%	-3.23%	24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TRMCX and FGSAX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1996	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between TRMCX and FGSAX has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TRMCX vs. FGSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMCX

TRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 53
TRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
TRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
TRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
TRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
TRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FGSAX

FGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRMCX	FGSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	0.21	+1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	0.43	+2.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.06	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	0.26	+2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	0.71	+10.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the FGSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMCX and FGSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRMCX	FGSAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	0.21	+1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.47	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.67	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.48	+0.15

Drawdowns

TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum FGSAX drawdown of -66.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and FGSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRMCX	FGSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.28%	-66.17%	+10.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.41%	-13.73%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.60%	-24.51%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.60%	-35.79%	+6.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.41%	-37.19%	-2.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.82%	+3.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-16.14%	+9.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	4.91%	-2.43%

Volatility

TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) is 3.51%, while Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that TRMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRMCX	FGSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	3.82%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	13.79%	-3.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.14%	16.83%	-2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.28%	22.41%	-3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.64%	22.32%	-2.68%

TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRMCX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FGSAX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRMCX vs. FGSAX - Dividend Comparison

TRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than FGSAX's 4.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund	4.88%	4.92%	4.32%	0.00%	2.31%	25.75%	7.07%	8.13%	14.46%	13.93%	0.89%	25.34%
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund	4.69%	5.43%	14.20%	7.65%	13.92%	9.22%	3.79%	4.25%	12.13%	6.58%	6.74%	11.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRMCX and FGSAX in my portfolio?

TRMCX and FGSAX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRMCX or FGSAX?

FGSAX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to TRMCX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMCX dropped -55.28% vs FGSAX's -66.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.