TRMCX vs. RPMGX

In the year-to-date period, TRMCX achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than RPMGX's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX has outperformed RPMGX with an annualized return of 8.55%, while RPMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.92% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TRMCX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than RPMGX's 0.72% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is comparable to the RPMGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMCX and RPMGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither TRMCX nor RPMGX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum RPMGX drawdown of -58.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and RPMGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) has a higher volatility of 14.03% compared to T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) at 11.02%. This indicates that TRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.