PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRMCX vs. EZM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRMCX vs. EZM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMCX achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly higher than EZM's 11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX has outperformed EZM with an annualized return of 11.33%, while EZM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.


TRMCX

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.29%
YTD
15.05%
6M
14.66%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
11.33%

EZM

1D
0.68%
1M
2.22%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.02%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRMCX vs. EZM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRMCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund
15.05%6.16%16.21%18.99%-4.16%24.51%9.84%19.59%-10.66%11.59%
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
11.29%8.42%10.29%19.69%-12.22%31.00%5.57%24.48%-12.36%17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TRMCX and EZM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2007

0.90

The correlation between TRMCX and EZM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRMCX vs. EZM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMCX
TRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

EZM
EZM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZM Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMCX vs. EZM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRMCXEZMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.85

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

9.66

+0.99

TRMCX vs. EZM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the EZM Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMCX and EZM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRMCXEZMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.67

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.40

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.48

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.41

+0.22

Drawdowns

TRMCX vs. EZM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum EZM drawdown of -59.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and EZM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRMCXEZMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-59.58%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-8.70%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

-23.53%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.60%

-23.53%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.41%

-47.26%

+7.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

0.00%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-8.27%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.56%

-0.08%

Volatility

TRMCX vs. EZM - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) at 3.33%. This indicates that TRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRMCXEZMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.33%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

10.25%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

14.84%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.28%

20.42%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

22.35%

-2.71%

TRMCX vs. EZM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRMCX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than EZM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRMCX vs. EZM - Dividend Comparison

TRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than EZM's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
1.25%1.39%1.22%1.25%1.57%1.08%1.67%1.34%1.57%1.14%1.55%1.30%
TRMCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund
4.72%5.43%14.20%7.65%13.92%9.22%3.79%4.25%12.13%6.58%6.74%11.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TRMCX and EZM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRMCX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to EZM (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMCX dropped -55.28% vs EZM's -59.58%.

TRMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRMCX and EZM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer