TRLIX vs. FSAGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRLIX (TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund) and FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) are both mutual funds - TRLIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by TIAA Investments, while FSAGX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, TRLIX returned 11.15%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for FSAGX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRLIX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FSAGX.

Performance

TRLIX vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLIX achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's 5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TRLIX has underperformed FSAGX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while FSAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.

TRLIX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 11.73%
• 1Y: 25.23%
• 3Y*: 18.57%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

FSAGX

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 6M: 12.28%
• 1Y: 61.74%
• 3Y*: 40.65%
• 5Y*: 16.56%
• 10Y*: 12.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLIX vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRLIX TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund	10.74%	17.44%	14.79%	14.35%	-7.03%	27.10%	3.59%	28.83%	-14.29%	10.89%
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.40%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLIX and FSAGX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002	0.25

The correlation between TRLIX and FSAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRLIX vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLIX

TRLIX Risk / Return Rank: 71
TRLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TRLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
TRLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TRLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
TRLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLIX vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRLIX	FSAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	1.45	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	1.83	+1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.26	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	2.07	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.34	5.41	+8.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRLIX vs. FSAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the FSAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLIX and FSAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRLIX	FSAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	1.45	+0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.50	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.37	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.22	+0.27

Drawdowns

TRLIX vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLIX drawdown since its inception was -61.94%, smaller than the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLIX and FSAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRLIX	FSAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.94%	-77.21%	+15.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-29.85%	+22.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.69%	-29.85%	+15.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.13%	-45.94%	+25.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.54%	-50.57%	+12.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	-22.82%	+22.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-33.35%	+24.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	11.40%	-9.58%

Volatility

TRLIX vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) is 3.02%, while Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that TRLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRLIX	FSAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	14.88%	-11.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.29%	35.12%	-26.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.83%	43.06%	-32.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.92%	33.60%	-18.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	33.10%	-15.05%

TRLIX vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLIX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAGX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRLIX vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison

TRLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than FSAGX's 4.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	4.87%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%	0.00%
TRLIX TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund	7.97%	8.82%	4.01%	8.58%	6.13%	9.19%	1.89%	2.08%	12.82%	5.19%	4.29%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRLIX and FSAGX in my portfolio?

TRLIX and FSAGX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRLIX or FSAGX?

FSAGX has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to TRLIX (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLIX dropped -61.94% vs FSAGX's -77.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.