PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIN vs. CLOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIN vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIN achieves a 30.54% return, which is significantly higher than CLOA's 2.26% return.


TRIN

1D
0.06%
1M
9.86%
YTD
30.54%
6M
30.19%
1Y
49.56%
3Y*
28.21%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*

CLOA

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
2.26%
6M
2.47%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIN vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
30.54%16.01%14.83%37.72%
CLOA
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF
2.26%5.44%7.25%8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIN and CLOA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIN vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIN
TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOA
CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIN vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRINCLOADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-11.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

3.41

-2.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

29.67

-26.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

151.25

-142.89

TRIN vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 7.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIN and CLOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRIN vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIN drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIN and CLOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRINCLOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-1.34%

-41.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-0.18%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-1.13%

-14.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.01%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-0.05%

-8.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

0.03%

+5.92%

Volatility

TRIN vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA) at 0.15%. This indicates that TRIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRINCLOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

0.15%

+7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.50%

0.49%

+16.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.07%

0.69%

+20.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.75%

1.31%

+25.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.02%

1.31%

+25.71%

Dividends

TRIN vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

TRIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.93%, more than CLOA's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CLOA
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF
4.95%5.35%6.01%5.88%0.00%0.00%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
20.93%13.92%14.10%14.04%21.32%7.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIN and CLOA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRIN has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to CLOA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIN dropped -43.12% vs CLOA's -1.34%.

CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.57 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIN and CLOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer