PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOA vs. CLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLOA vs. CLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) and Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLOA vs. CLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
0.94%5.44%7.25%4.01%
CLOX
Panagram AAA CLO ETF
1.01%5.52%7.16%3.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOA achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than CLOX's 1.01% return.


CLOA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.94%
6M
2.27%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
10Y*

CLOX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.01%
6M
2.48%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOA vs. CLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLOA and CLOX have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CLOA vs. CLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOA
CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOX
CLOX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOA vs. CLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) and Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOACLOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.34

1.04

+2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.54

1.30

+3.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.22

1.51

+0.71

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

1.36

+3.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

36.22

15.61

+20.62

CLOA vs. CLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOA Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the CLOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOA and CLOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOACLOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

1.04

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.12

1.93

+3.19

Correlation

The correlation between CLOA and CLOX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLOA vs. CLOX - Dividend Comparison

CLOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than CLOX's 5.00% yield.


TTM202520242023
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
5.21%5.35%6.01%5.88%
CLOX
Panagram AAA CLO ETF
5.00%5.18%6.25%2.90%

Drawdowns

CLOA vs. CLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOA drawdown since its inception was -1.34%, smaller than the maximum CLOX drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOA and CLOX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOACLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-4.13%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.10%

-4.02%

+2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.09%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.15%

0.35%

-0.20%

Volatility

CLOA vs. CLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) is 0.27%, while Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that CLOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLOACLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

0.63%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.51%

0.90%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64%

5.22%

-3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.35%

3.42%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.35%

3.42%

-2.07%