TRILX vs. PUDZX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund (TRILX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX).
TRILX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. PUDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010.
Performance
TRILX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRILX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRILX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund | -1.15% | 12.94% | 7.85% | 11.89% | -13.47% | 7.13% | 12.05% | 15.39% | -2.66% | 9.13% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 10.18% | 13.40% | 8.61% | 3.26% | -2.76% | 18.49% | 4.84% | 16.29% | -9.20% | 6.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRILX achieves a -1.15% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 10.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TRILX has underperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 5.89%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.01% annualized return.
TRILX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 5.89%
PUDZX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRILX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRILX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TRILX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank
TRILX
PUDZX
TRILX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund (TRILX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRILX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 2.04 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.65 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.45 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 13.65 | -5.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRILX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.04 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.87 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.73 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.52 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRILX and PUDZX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRILX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison
TRILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than PUDZX's 8.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRILX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund | 3.03% | 3.49% | 5.25% | 2.61% | 3.50% | 4.07% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 2.96% | 0.90% | 2.12% | 0.95% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 8.10% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 3.66% | 9.10% | 13.00% | 4.94% | 3.40% | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
TRILX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRILX drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum PUDZX drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRILX and PUDZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRILX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.55% | -21.53% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | -8.20% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.55% | -17.98% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.55% | -21.53% | +2.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.96% | -1.59% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -5.31% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 1.47% | -0.22% |
Volatility
TRILX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund (TRILX) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 2.71%. This indicates that TRILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRILX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 2.71% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.50% | 6.29% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.32% | 9.72% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.42% | 10.59% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.21% | 9.70% | -2.49% |