TRILX vs. FCSRX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TRILX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund) and FCSRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TRILX returned 6.40%/yr vs 4.66%/yr for FCSRX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRILX charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for FCSRX.

Performance

TRILX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund (TRILX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRILX achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than FCSRX's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TRILX has outperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 6.40%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.

TRILX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 6M: 5.40%
• 1Y: 13.93%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: 5.00%
• 10Y*: 6.40%

FCSRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 8.17%
• 6M: 8.46%
• 1Y: 15.18%
• 3Y*: 9.06%
• 5Y*: 5.17%
• 10Y*: 4.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRILX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRILX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund	5.17%	12.94%	7.85%	11.89%	-13.47%	7.13%	12.05%	15.39%	-2.66%	9.13%
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	8.17%	9.27%	4.75%	3.60%	-4.26%	14.68%	2.60%	9.54%	-5.03%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TRILX and FCSRX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between TRILX and FCSRX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TRILX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRILX

TRILX Risk / Return Rank: 63
TRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
TRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
TRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FCSRX

FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRILX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund (TRILX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRILX	FCSRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	3.34	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	4.71	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.67	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	7.68	-5.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	28.74	-16.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRILX vs. FCSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the FCSRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRILX and FCSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRILX	FCSRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	3.34	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.75	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.70	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.44	+0.51

Drawdowns

TRILX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRILX drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRILX and FCSRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRILX	FCSRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.55%	-33.91%	+15.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.30%	-1.99%	-3.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.36%	-5.85%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.55%	-13.22%	-5.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.55%	-20.02%	+1.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.85%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-5.09%	+2.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	0.53%	+0.60%

Volatility

TRILX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund (TRILX) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.21%. This indicates that TRILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRILX	FCSRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.01%	1.21%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.91%	3.57%	+1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.00%	4.57%	+1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.47%	6.89%	+0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.25%	6.71%	+0.54%

TRILX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRILX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRILX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison

TRILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than FCSRX's 3.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	3.27%	3.74%	3.86%	4.35%	6.51%	4.53%	1.32%	2.20%	8.51%	1.58%	1.34%	0.66%
TRILX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index Retirement Income Fund	2.85%	3.49%	5.25%	2.61%	3.50%	4.07%	2.15%	2.39%	2.96%	0.90%	2.12%	0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRILX and FCSRX in my portfolio?

TRILX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRILX or FCSRX?

TRILX has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to FCSRX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRILX dropped -18.55% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.