TRIFX vs. CLPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX).
TRIFX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on May 20, 2008. CLPAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013.
Performance
TRIFX vs. CLPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRIFX vs. CLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIFX Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund | -1.29% | 5.53% | 10.63% | 14.49% | -12.48% | 24.45% | 5.12% | 19.43% | -7.19% | 12.65% |
CLPAX Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund | -6.01% | 12.32% | 11.42% | 35.92% | -30.54% | 13.11% | 5.25% | 19.41% | -3.65% | 8.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIFX achieves a -1.29% return, which is significantly higher than CLPAX's -6.01% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIFX has outperformed CLPAX with an annualized return of 9.16%, while CLPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.45% annualized return.
TRIFX
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- -1.29%
- 6M
- -3.98%
- 1Y
- 7.37%
- 3Y*
- 9.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
CLPAX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -6.20%
- 1Y
- 14.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRIFX vs. CLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIFX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CLPAX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRIFX vs. CLPAX — Risk / Return Rank
TRIFX
CLPAX
TRIFX vs. CLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) and Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIFX | CLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.95 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 1.47 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.19 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.21 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 3.60 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIFX | CLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.95 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.31 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.38 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.34 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIFX and CLPAX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TRIFX vs. CLPAX - Dividend Comparison
TRIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than CLPAX's 9.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIFX Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund | 5.91% | 4.90% | 7.36% | 5.42% | 4.84% | 5.15% | 5.44% | 5.36% | 7.10% | 6.47% | 6.14% | 10.01% |
CLPAX Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund | 9.69% | 9.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.68% | 0.32% | 0.49% | 5.41% | 0.30% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 17.26% |
Drawdowns
TRIFX vs. CLPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIFX drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, which is greater than CLPAX's maximum drawdown of -32.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIFX and CLPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIFX | CLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.53% | -32.47% | -22.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -12.87% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.76% | -32.47% | +11.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | -32.47% | -2.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -11.89% | +6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.36% | -8.16% | -10.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 4.32% | -0.57% |
Volatility
TRIFX vs. CLPAX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) at 3.45%. This indicates that TRIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRIFX | CLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 3.45% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | 9.92% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 16.59% | -2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.67% | 15.63% | -4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.71% | 14.39% | -2.68% |