PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIFX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIFX achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIFX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.87%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


TRIFX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
3.86%
6M
3.05%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
8.87%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIFX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRIFX
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund
3.86%5.53%10.63%14.49%-12.48%24.45%5.12%19.43%-7.19%12.65%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIFX and VOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.70

The correlation between TRIFX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIFX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIFX
TRIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TRIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRIFXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.02

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

13.58

-8.73

TRIFX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIFX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRIFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIFX drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIFX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRIFXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.53%

-33.99%

-20.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-8.90%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-18.69%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

-24.52%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-33.99%

-1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-1.74%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-3.68%

-14.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

1.98%

+0.96%

Volatility

TRIFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) is 2.58%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that TRIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRIFXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

4.60%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

9.73%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

12.39%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.74%

16.90%

-6.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.69%

18.05%

-6.36%

TRIFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRIFX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRIFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

TRIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRIFX
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund
6.03%4.90%7.36%5.42%4.84%5.15%5.44%5.36%7.10%6.47%6.14%10.01%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIFX and VOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to TRIFX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIFX dropped -54.53% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIFX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer