CLPAX vs. ROM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CLPAX (Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund) and ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) are both funds - CLPAX is a Derivative Income fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds, while ROM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, CLPAX returned 7.94%/yr vs 40.03%/yr for ROM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLPAX charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ROM.

Performance

CLPAX vs. ROM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLPAX achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 48.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CLPAX has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 7.94%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 40.03% annualized return.

CLPAX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: 16.56%
• 6M: 11.98%
• 1Y: 28.56%
• 3Y*: 17.45%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: 7.94%

ROM

• 1D: -13.45%
• 1M: 10.48%
• YTD: 48.72%
• 6M: 42.70%
• 1Y: 111.79%
• 3Y*: 50.76%
• 5Y*: 27.09%
• 10Y*: 40.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLPAX vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLPAX Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund	16.56%	12.32%	11.42%	35.92%	-30.54%	13.11%	5.25%	19.41%	-3.65%	8.20%
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	48.72%	35.63%	31.65%	130.70%	-63.86%	77.75%	80.42%	102.10%	-9.89%	81.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CLPAX and ROM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2014	0.84

The correlation between CLPAX and ROM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CLPAX vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLPAX

CLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 42
CLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
CLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

ROM

ROM Risk / Return Rank: 68
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLPAX vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLPAX	ROM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.55	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.76	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.38	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	3.48	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.07	10.57	-4.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLPAX vs. ROM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the ROM Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLPAX and ROM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLPAX	ROM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	2.55	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.52	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.80	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.51	-0.05

Drawdowns

CLPAX vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLPAX drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, smaller than the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLPAX and ROM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLPAX	ROM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.47%	-83.36%	+50.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.87%	-32.33%	+19.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.37%	-48.10%	+29.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.47%	-67.55%	+35.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.47%	-67.55%	+35.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-18.00%	+17.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.08%	-20.87%	+12.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.59%	10.62%	-6.03%

Volatility

CLPAX vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund (CLPAX) is 4.95%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 21.05%. This indicates that CLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLPAX	ROM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	21.05%	-16.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.25%	36.69%	-26.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.66%	44.14%	-30.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.81%	51.96%	-36.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.47%	50.01%	-35.54%

CLPAX vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLPAX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ROM's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLPAX vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison

CLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than ROM's 0.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLPAX Catalyst Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Fund	7.81%	9.10%	0.00%	0.00%	2.68%	0.32%	0.49%	5.41%	0.30%	0.02%	0.00%	17.26%
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	0.16%	0.24%	0.21%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.16%	0.30%	0.08%	0.20%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLPAX and ROM in my portfolio?

CLPAX and ROM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLPAX or ROM?

ROM has higher volatility (21.05%) compared to CLPAX (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLPAX dropped -32.47% vs ROM's -83.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.