PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRGP vs. GEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRGP vs. GEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) and Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRGP achieves a 49.23% return, which is significantly higher than GEL's -0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, TRGP has outperformed GEL with an annualized return of 26.71%, while GEL has yielded a comparatively lower -1.69% annualized return.


TRGP

1D
1.20%
1M
3.54%
YTD
49.23%
6M
50.30%
1Y
64.85%
3Y*
60.15%
5Y*
45.14%
10Y*
26.71%

GEL

1D
-3.38%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
-0.96%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
-5.86%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
-1.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRGP vs. GEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
49.23%5.65%110.12%21.01%43.71%100.15%-32.48%23.98%-19.88%-7.09%
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
-0.96%61.77%-8.37%19.90%1.05%84.99%-66.17%22.60%-9.18%-32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TRGP and GEL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2010

0.52

The correlation between TRGP and GEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TRGP:

$13.11

GEL:

$0.39

PE Ratio

TRGP:

20.79

GEL:

38.57

PEG Ratio

TRGP:

0.23

GEL:

0.53

PS Ratio

TRGP:

2.70

GEL:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRGP:

$16.38B

GEL:

$1.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRGP:

$3.62B

GEL:

$281.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

TRGP:

$4.49B

GEL:

$437.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRGP vs. GEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRGP
TRGP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TRGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRGP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TRGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRGP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

GEL
GEL Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRGP vs. GEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) and Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRGPGELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.99

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

-0.33

+4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

-0.79

+13.81

TRGP vs. GEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRGP Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the GEL Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRGP and GEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRGP vs. GEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRGP drawdown since its inception was -95.21%, roughly equal to the maximum GEL drawdown of -91.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRGP and GEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRGPGELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.21%

-91.63%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.30%

-17.85%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.61%

-31.46%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.61%

-38.79%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.78%

-89.61%

-1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-38.19%

+36.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.55%

-34.14%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

7.45%

-2.45%

Volatility

TRGP vs. GEL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) is 7.77%, while Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) has a volatility of 9.38%. This indicates that TRGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRGPGELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

9.38%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

18.98%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.29%

27.84%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.90%

41.26%

-9.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.62%

51.19%

-3.57%

Dividends

TRGP vs. GEL - Dividend Comparison

TRGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than GEL's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
4.56%4.23%6.08%5.18%5.88%5.60%16.10%10.74%11.37%11.87%7.54%6.72%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
1.56%2.03%1.54%2.13%1.90%0.77%4.59%8.92%10.11%7.52%6.49%12.53%

Financials

TRGP vs. GEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Targa Resources Corp. and Genesis Energy, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
4.09B
446.56M
(TRGP) Total Revenue
(GEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TRGP vs. GEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Targa Resources Corp. and Genesis Energy, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
TRGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 446.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TRGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported an operating income of 846.90M and revenue of 4.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

GEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported an operating income of 76.61M and revenue of 446.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.

TRGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported a net income of 479.60M and revenue of 4.09B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

GEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported a net income of 19.37M and revenue of 446.56M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TRGP and GEL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEL has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to TRGP (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRGP dropped -95.21% vs GEL's -91.63%.

TRGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRGP and GEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer