TRFM vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
TRFM and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRFM is a passively managed fund by AAM that tracks the performance of the Pence Transformers Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 11, 2022. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2004. Both TRFM and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TRFM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRFM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | -0.59% | 25.76% | 19.96% | 44.71% | -7.38% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | -6.16% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -3.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFM achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -6.16% return.
TRFM
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -2.92%
- 1Y
- 36.00%
- 3Y*
- 21.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -3.61%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -5.90%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- 21.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRFM vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRFM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
TRFM
VGT
TRFM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRFM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.10 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.67 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 1.88 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.73 | 5.77 | +2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRFM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.10 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.61 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFM and VGT is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRFM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
TRFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than VGT's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | 0.17% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
TRFM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFM drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFM and VGT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.40% | -54.63% | +26.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.15% | -16.40% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.17% | -11.66% | +4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -8.00% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 5.35% | -1.06% |
Volatility
TRFM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.03%. This indicates that TRFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRFM | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.47% | 8.03% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.88% | 16.35% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.31% | 27.27% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 25.06% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 24.48% | +2.57% |