TRET.L vs. QDVD.DE
TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and QDVD.DE (iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRET.L is a REIT fund tracking the GPR Global 100 Index, while QDVD.DE is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI USA High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TRET.L returned 5.65%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for QDVD.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRET.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for QDVD.DE.
Performance
TRET.L vs. QDVD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TRET.L is traded in USD, while QDVD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRET.L achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than QDVD.DE's 14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TRET.L has underperformed QDVD.DE with an annualized return of 5.65%, while QDVD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.63% annualized return.
TRET.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- 14.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
QDVD.DE
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
TRET.L vs. QDVD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 8.17% | 14.41% | 1.07% | 13.92% | -25.67% | 29.73% | -6.91% | 36.63% | 0.98% | -3.31% |
QDVD.DE iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF | 14.16% | 17.58% | 14.94% | 14.04% | -6.53% | 21.95% | -0.31% | 22.57% | -4.23% | 18.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRET.L and QDVD.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014 | 0.51 |
The correlation between TRET.L and QDVD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRET.L vs. QDVD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
TRET.L
QDVD.DE
TRET.L vs. QDVD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRET.L | QDVD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 3.62 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 13.85 | -9.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRET.L vs. QDVD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRET.L drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, which is greater than QDVD.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.L and QDVD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRET.L | QDVD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.25% | -33.22% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.49% | -8.13% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -18.43% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.35% | -18.43% | -14.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.25% | -33.22% | -9.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | 0.00% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -3.36% | -7.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.13% | +0.94% |
Volatility
TRET.L vs. QDVD.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE) at 3.59%. This indicates that TRET.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRET.L | QDVD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 3.59% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 8.32% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 11.37% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 14.42% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 14.97% | +3.01% |
TRET.L vs. QDVD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRET.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVD.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRET.L vs. QDVD.DE - Dividend Comparison
TRET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than QDVD.DE's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVD.DE iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF | 1.07% | 1.72% | 1.88% | 2.04% | 2.34% | 1.99% | 2.72% | 2.37% | 2.43% | 2.28% | 2.19% | 2.44% |
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.36% | 3.54% | 3.56% | 3.54% | 4.55% | 1.86% | 4.18% | 3.32% | 5.03% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRET.L and QDVD.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRET.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRET.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QDVD.DE.
TRET.L is categorized as REIT, while QDVD.DE is ESG. TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index, while QDVD.DE tracks MSCI USA High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.L and 0.35% for QDVD.DE.
Find the right allocation for TRET.L and QDVD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer