PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TRET.L vs. HAUZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TRET.L vs. HAUZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and HAUZ (Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - TRET.L tracks the GPR Global 100 Index while HAUZ tracks the iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRET.L returned 2.34%/yr vs -1.45%/yr for HAUZ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRET.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for HAUZ.

Performance

TRET.L vs. HAUZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRET.L achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly higher than HAUZ's -2.20% return.

TRET.L

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
4.02%
6M
3.83%
1Y
10.68%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*
—

HAUZ

1D
0.46%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
-0.48%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
-1.45%
10Y*
3.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRET.L vs. HAUZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRET.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		4.02%14.43%1.05%13.94%-25.68%29.73%-6.91%10.01%
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF		-2.20%22.70%-5.44%6.29%-22.24%9.82%-6.23%15.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TRET.L and HAUZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.59

The correlation between TRET.L and HAUZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

TRET.L vs. HAUZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TRET.L
HAUZ

Real Estate

99.9%
96.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.3%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

1.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

1.3%

Technology

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Real Estate

TRET.L
99.9%
HAUZ
96.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TRET.L
0.1%
HAUZ
0.3%

Financial Services

TRET.L
0.0%
HAUZ
0.3%

Basic Materials

TRET.L

-

HAUZ
0.1%

Communication Services

TRET.L

-

HAUZ
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

TRET.L

-

HAUZ
0.0%

Energy

TRET.L

-

HAUZ
0.0%

Healthcare

TRET.L

-

HAUZ
0.0%

Industrials

TRET.L

-

HAUZ
1.3%

Technology

TRET.L

-

HAUZ
0.1%

Utilities

TRET.L

-

HAUZ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF

Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF

Often compared with TRET.L:
TRET.L vs. DPYE.LTRET.L vs. BRNT.LTRET.L vs. DTRE.LTRET.L vs. QOZ.AXTRET.L vs. HPRD.LTRET.L vs. WNEW.LTRET.L vs. HPRO.L
Often compared with HAUZ:
HAUZ vs. VNQIHAUZ vs. VNQHAUZ vs. REETHAUZ vs. SCHHHAUZ vs. NUREHAUZ vs. RESGXHAUZ vs. XLRE

Return for Risk

TRET.L vs. HAUZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TRET.L
TRET.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TRET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
HAUZ
HAUZ Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HAUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HAUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRET.L vs. HAUZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TRET.LHAUZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.86
0.42

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.31
0.69

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.08

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

0.41

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

1.22

+2.32

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRET.L vs. HAUZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRET.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the HAUZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRET.L and HAUZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TRET.LHAUZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.42

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

-0.09

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.21

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.18

+0.04

Drawdowns

TRET.L vs. HAUZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRET.L drawdown since its inception was -42.26%, which is greater than HAUZ's maximum drawdown of -39.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.L and HAUZ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TRET.LHAUZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.26%

-39.51%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-14.08%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-17.88%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.35%

-34.52%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.51%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

-11.33%

+5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-11.75%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

4.71%

-1.71%

Volatility

TRET.L vs. HAUZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) is 3.91%, while Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that TRET.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAUZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TRET.LHAUZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

4.68%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

11.47%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

13.82%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

15.95%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

16.97%

+2.21%

TRET.L vs. HAUZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRET.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HAUZ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRET.L vs. HAUZ - Dividend Comparison

TRET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than HAUZ's 4.56% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF		4.56%4.46%4.50%3.50%1.99%4.84%3.37%3.69%1.93%2.59%2.18%9.42%
TRET.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		3.49%3.54%3.56%3.54%4.56%1.86%4.18%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TRET.L and HAUZ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TRET.L.

TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index, while HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.L and 0.10% for HAUZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRET.L and HAUZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer