PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRET.DE achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than 10AJ.DE's 7.96% return.


TRET.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
5.31%
6M
4.13%
1Y
9.15%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*

10AJ.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
7.96%
6M
7.43%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TRET.DE
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
5.31%1.87%6.86%9.89%-21.28%40.76%-15.21%22.15%-7.54%
10AJ.DE
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist
7.96%-1.85%5.52%6.85%-20.55%36.79%-16.96%23.88%-6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TRET.DE and 10AJ.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2018

0.94

The correlation between TRET.DE and 10AJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRET.DE
TRET.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
TRET.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRET.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRET.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRET.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRET.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

10AJ.DE
10AJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRET.DE10AJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

1.20

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

3.94

-0.56

TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRET.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the 10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRET.DE and 10AJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRET.DE10AJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.85

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.13

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.22

0.00

Drawdowns

TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRET.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.75%, roughly equal to the maximum 10AJ.DE drawdown of -42.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.DE and 10AJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRET.DE10AJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.75%

-42.62%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-7.89%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.60%

-20.52%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.36%

-30.01%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-6.63%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.19%

-12.13%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.41%

+0.18%

Volatility

TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) at 2.70%. This indicates that TRET.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 10AJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRET.DE10AJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.70%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

8.38%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

11.14%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

14.60%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

17.10%

+0.73%

TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRET.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 10AJ.DE's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRET.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

TRET.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than 10AJ.DE's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
10AJ.DE
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.77%2.99%2.94%2.98%3.23%2.13%3.10%2.92%2.63%
TRET.DE
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
3.48%3.66%3.44%3.66%4.69%1.78%4.45%3.31%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TRET.DE and 10AJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 10AJ.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

10AJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TRET.DE.

TRET.DE tracks GPR Global 100, while 10AJ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.DE and 0.24% for 10AJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRET.DE and 10AJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer